tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post8984410391443499231..comments2024-03-18T17:42:24.279-04:00Comments on Dave Dubya's Freedom Rants: Freedom And Suppression Of FreedomDave Dubyahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03279370558997246976noreply@blogger.comBlogger130125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-5343187483193641222017-02-01T17:39:12.967-05:002017-02-01T17:39:12.967-05:00So Jerry's what's the plan liberals have t...So Jerry's what's the plan liberals have to defeat Islamic terrorism?<br /><br />Why do democrats want to use extreme vetting on President Trump's nominees but no on refugees and immigrates?<br /><br />Are you disappointed that Nobel Peace Prize winner former President Obama was not able to win the war against Islamic Terrorism? <br /><br /> "A ban has nothing to do with vetting refugees" You don't understand that President Trump said the ban was temporary until the vetting process was improved? What's wrong with that if like you said you want vetting?<br /><br />Dave, <br /><br />You really don't have a answer do. After 8 years of Obama we are still at war, still under the threat of Islamic terrorism. You must be ok with that.<br /><br />Majormajorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05475952962470772705noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-7549176869394017992017-02-01T15:49:55.060-05:002017-02-01T15:49:55.060-05:00Chuck wonders:
when have you ever offered solution...Chuck wonders:<br /><i>when have you ever offered solutions, much less answered questions?</i><br /><br />Proof I was correct. He either doesn't read what we write, or ignores us. Either way, his whine isn't worth the dignity of a response.<br /><br /><br />Dave Dubyahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03279370558997246976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-62586590000020003242017-02-01T13:27:13.349-05:002017-02-01T13:27:13.349-05:00Mm - "So you now support President Trump'...Mm - "So you now support President Trump's plan for defeating Islamic terrorism? <br />So you now support President Trump's plan for extreme vetting of refugees?<br />So you now support President Trump's plan to secure our boarders?"<br /><br />You are asking the wrong questions. Liberals are not against defeating terrorism of any kind including Islamic. Liberals are not against improving vetting of refugees even though current vetting is working. Liberals are not against securing out borders.<br /><br />Liberals are against a blanket ban on people from Trump's seven countries. Such a ban does nothing to defeat Islamic terrorism or terrorism from any other group. A ban has nothing to do with vetting refugees. It in fact negates vetting. And a wall does not significantly Increase our border security according to experts, real ones not armchair ones. Jerry Critterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01870618647449723147noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-35095771429961564502017-02-01T13:06:42.974-05:002017-02-01T13:06:42.974-05:00LOL DD when have you ever offered solutions, much ...LOL DD when have you ever offered solutions, much less answered questions???<br />You, JG and liberals are against conservatives solutions to these problems, were are your solutions?<br /><br />What would liberals do about vetting, protecting our borders, ending the war with Islamic terrorism? Come guys step up to the plate with YOUR solutions.<br /><br />I find it laughable that the Democrats are stonewalling President Trump's cabinet nominates claiming they need to be extreme vetted, yet are opposed extreme vetting refugees.<br /><br />What false assumptions am I making about you DD?<br /><br />So you now support President Trump's plan for defeating Islamic terrorism? <br />So you now support President Trump's plan for extreme vetting of refugees?<br />So you now support President Trump's plan to secure our boarders?<br /><br />Put up or shut up liberals.<br /> <br />Majormajorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05475952962470772705noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-67225913067663894242017-02-01T10:34:27.306-05:002017-02-01T10:34:27.306-05:00Why does Chuck demand answers without offering sol...Why does Chuck demand answers without offering solutions?<br /><br />Why does he make false assumptions about others?<br /><br />Sounds like con-sense to me.Dave Dubyahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03279370558997246976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-77500906567606337572017-02-01T09:38:25.641-05:002017-02-01T09:38:25.641-05:00Why are DD and JG opposed to improving our vetting...Why are DD and JG opposed to improving our vetting of legal immigrates and refuges?<br /><br />Why are JG and DD opposed to building a wall on our southern border?<br /><br />What solution to radical Islamic terrorism do DD and JG support?<br /><br />How would DD and JG do to pay off our national debt?<br /><br />Long on criticisms, short on solutions?Majormajorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05475952962470772705noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-66604058826031565182017-02-01T06:25:16.028-05:002017-02-01T06:25:16.028-05:00Chuck "Majormajor" Morre: "But now ...<b>Chuck "Majormajor" Morre</b>: "<i>But now we blame the white guy.</i>"<br /><br />Well, yes, but the <i>other</i> white guy -- George W. Bush. He's ultimately responsible for the conflict and unrest in the Middle East which has directly resulted in the current refugee crisis in Europe and elsewhere. He, along with the <i>other</i> white guys, Cheney and Rumsfeld, should be prosecuted for war crimes and crimes against humanity. <br /><br /><br /><b>Dave Dubya</b>: "<i>Rasmussen (R) stands alone with over 50% approval.</i>"<br /><br />That's understandable. (See my comment dated January 30, 2017 at 10:50 AM.) Jefferson's Guardianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16950868026721859555noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-38583242841274346972017-01-31T16:40:21.111-05:002017-01-31T16:40:21.111-05:00Ban or not a ban?
Both, according to Trumpian and...Ban or not a ban?<br /><br />Both, according to Trumpian and (TP's) doublethink.<br /><br />Trump told reporters that his executive order was “working out very nicely,” adding “we’re going to have a very, very strict ban.” He tweeted, “If the ban were announced with a one week notice, the "bad" would rush into our country during that week. A lot of bad "dudes" out there!”<br /><br />Mouthpiece Sean Spicer said it's "Not a ban".<br /><br />So, there.<br /><br />Better blame the evil media. Dave Dubyahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03279370558997246976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-14722345631762058602017-01-31T15:45:08.096-05:002017-01-31T15:45:08.096-05:00Thanks for clarifying mm's alternate facts, al...Thanks for clarifying mm's alternate facts, alternate facts without any support. But then, we all know that truth gets in the way of alternate facts, better known as lies. Jerry Critterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01870618647449723147noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-3987182571843223942017-01-31T14:09:57.469-05:002017-01-31T14:09:57.469-05:00Chuck,
Thank you for approving of Obama's act...<br />Chuck,<br /><br />Thank you for approving of Obama's actions against a clear and real threat. They went on to improve screening after that. <br /><br /> “Alternative facts” zombies don’t care for the truth:<br /><br />Factcheck.org:<br /><br />President Donald Trump defended his sweeping immigration policy by calling it “similar to what President Obama did in 2011 when he banned visas for refugees from Iraq for six months.” That’s a faulty comparison.<br />There was a delay in processing Iraqi refugees in 2011 after it was discovered that two Iraqi refugees living in Kentucky had been involved in roadside bombing attacks on U.S. troops in Iraq.<br /><br />The Kentucky case not only caused a backlog in processing Iraqi refugees in 2011, but it also resulted in an overhaul of the refugee screening process.<br /><br />The Obama administration’s actions were limited to one country and in response to a specific threat — the potential for other Iraqi refugees to take advantage of a flaw in the screening process.<br />By contrast, Trump ordered a far wider ban — albeit also temporary — without identifying a specific threat.<br /><br />But what Obama did was not a ban, and it did not involve visas.<br /><br />Trump’s comparison of his immigration actions to Obama’s policy in 2011 is a faulty one. The fact is that the Obama administration was responding to a known and specific threat from one country and limited its response to refugees from that country, while Trump’s order temporarily bans refugees from all countries — indefinitely in the case of those from Syria — and temporarily bars all other visitors from seven predominately Muslim countries.<br /><br />Meanwhile:<br /><br /><br />http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/trump_favorableunfavorable-5493.html<br /><br /><br />3 polls put Trump in the ‘30s for approval.<br /><br />FOX News (R) has approval at 42% and disapproval at 55%<br />Rasmussen (R) stands alone with over 50% approval.<br />Dave Dubyahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03279370558997246976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-68283669367714046102017-01-31T13:39:47.367-05:002017-01-31T13:39:47.367-05:00Over 50% Americans are to Trump being president.
...Over 50% Americans are to Trump being president. <br />Not the truth.<br /><br /><br />In 2011 the US discovered Al-Qaeda terrorists living as refugees in Kentucky.<br />ABC reported:<br />As a result of the Kentucky case, the State Department stopped processing Iraq refugees for six months in 2011, federal officials told ABC News – even for many who had heroically helped U.S. forces as interpreters and intelligence assets. One Iraqi who had aided American troops was assassinated before his refugee application could be processed, because of the immigration delays, two U.S. officials said. In 2011, fewer than 10,000 Iraqis were resettled as refugees in the U.S., half the number from the year before, State Department statistics show.<br /><br /><br />But now we blame the white guy.<br /><br />Majormajorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05475952962470772705noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-7653600869184533662017-01-31T13:29:53.705-05:002017-01-31T13:29:53.705-05:00TP,
Do you call the radical left going crazy whe...TP, <br /><br />Do you call the radical left going crazy when Obama issued a similar immigration EO specifically targeting Cubans? <br /><br />During his last week in office, President Obama repealed a long-standing executive order known as “Wet Foot/Dry Foot,” which allowed all Cubans legally touching U.S. soil to stay here illegally. The objective of the executive order was to give sanctuary to Cubans risking their lives on makeshift vessels trying to sail to the United States and escape the oppressive communist regime that has governed there for over half a century.<br /><br />Sanctuary for those fleeing a communist country is not safe for America? <br />Please. <br /><br />Oh I forgot, must blame the white guy.Majormajorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05475952962470772705noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-20416501495862613612017-01-31T12:22:31.839-05:002017-01-31T12:22:31.839-05:00TP - "When one is acting foolish, sometimes p...TP - "When one is acting foolish, sometimes pointing it out by taking their nonsense to the logical conclusion of it will better make the point."<br /><br />Acting foolish? So, protesting a unilateral (executive order) action that is questionably unconstitutional, is foolish? I happen to think that protest is a hallmark of democracy, even if I don't agree with the protest.<br /><br />Logical conclusion? I think the logical conclusion to the protests is the rescinding the executive order. I don't see how open borders is the logical conclusion, at all. It is an illogical conclusion that hurts your argument. Jerry Critterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01870618647449723147noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-13160399786559682682017-01-31T10:42:38.817-05:002017-01-31T10:42:38.817-05:00I am leaving to get on a plane, but I will address...I am leaving to get on a plane, but I will address your foolishness later, Mr. Dubya. Hopefully there won't be anarchists and progressive snowflakes still gumming up the works at the airport in their "protests".Darrell Michaelshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05474956372325309461noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-17526434665994273712017-01-31T10:39:04.752-05:002017-01-31T10:39:04.752-05:00Jerry, I was using hyperbole to make a point, sir....Jerry, I was using hyperbole to make a point, sir. I realize that even few progressives truly want completely open borders. It is also why I used my tongue-in-cheek characterization of myself that Mr. Dubya sometimes suggests that I am. When one is acting foolish, sometimes pointing it out by taking their nonsense to the logical conclusion of it will better make the point.Darrell Michaelshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05474956372325309461noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-84536628305648399782017-01-31T07:50:18.834-05:002017-01-31T07:50:18.834-05:00T. Paine: "Everyone is in turmoil on the left...<b>T. Paine</b>: "<i>Everyone is in turmoil on the left because Trump came into office doing precisely what he said he would do. Amazing.</i>"<br /><br />Trump also said, prior to assuming office, that he "grabs their pussy." -- about which most people, with even a modicum of character, were outraged. <br /><br />Should the left, then, ignore that <i>also</i> and look the other way when he decides that is what he's going to do? Your statement indicates that not only <i>a priori</i> assumptions should be ignored -- but also observation and experience -- should he commit an action that he already indicated he would commit.<br /><br />I suppose that's your "con-sense" way of justifying it. <br /><br /><br />"<i>In the words of the <b>leftist corporate media</b>...</i>" [bold font used for emphasis]<br /><br />That's an oxymoron.<br /><br />Mr. Paine, we've already been through this. As I explained a post or so ago, the mainstream media in this country is owned by just a handful of media conglomerates -- vastly different from as recently as the 1970s, for example, when there were literally hundreds of independently owned outlets. Despite this, I recall your response to be that these mega-media giants employed liberal and leftist reporters and writers, nonetheless, who presented their viewpoints. Amazingly, to me, you inferred that this is the slant that the public was presented.<br /><br />Really?!? Do you <i>really</i> think that's how it works? <br /><br />I recall a quotation by Upton Sinclair who said, "<i>It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it!</i>" I think, as far as all those leftists and liberals who you claim are pecking away at their typewriters, assailing the airways <i>owned by</i> the conservative media conglomerates, a more up-to-date rendition should be: "It is difficult to get a person to say or write something, when their salary depends upon their <i>not</i> saying or writing it!"<br /><br />Let that sink in, Mr. Paine, before you attempt to refute it. <br /><br />You've always said you respect lefties and liberals who attempt to find common ground with conservatives, and you've cited Rain who frequents Tom's blog as an example. Yet you rarely apply the same rules to yourself and instead choose to revert to your "con-sense" whenever your cultist beliefs are threatened or assaulted. I strongly suggest that you take a page from your chosen moniker -- specifically the title of his famous publication -- and use a little yourself.Jefferson's Guardianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16950868026721859555noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-24815507594952565672017-01-31T07:45:25.417-05:002017-01-31T07:45:25.417-05:00This comment has been removed by the author.Jefferson's Guardianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16950868026721859555noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-57844851596206817532017-01-31T01:23:45.756-05:002017-01-31T01:23:45.756-05:00I guess Trump should tear down the wall and have o...<i>I guess Trump should tear down the wall and have open borders where all immigrants, legal or otherwise should come into the country just like the Democrats want</i><br /><br />Jerry,<br /><br />This is TP proving again what I said about his false beliefs. (It seems he still believes his Commissar Bannon lie about Obama sending "millions" of dollars to defeat Netanyahu.) As noted, this is only one of many. <br /><br />They are so arrogant when they tell US what WE want and think. They can lie about us because we are "less American" than they are. They know us better than we know ourselves, or so their goddamn propaganda tells them.<br /><br />I'm sick of their evil hateful bullshit. That is exactly what it is. And they don't care. They are a cult of true believers. <br /><br />Let's be clear. I don’t hate them. They can be very kind and loving people. So can other cults like Scientologists, I imagine. But there is a dark corner in their soul, or rather in their amygdala. That primitive fear center of authoritarians’ brains is more active than in most of us. I am saddened by their lack of understanding and empathy. I am disappointed in their gullibility. I am outraged at the outright hate and authoritarian ravages on freedom we have seen from their worst. <br /><br />TP is doubling down on his Trumpism. I saw this coming. It is in his authoritarian nature. After all, the only "real problem" with Trump was he used to be a democrat.<br /><br />Not a peep about Trump's open pro-torture beliefs. His "constitutional" cult followers seem to agree there is no such thing as "cruel and unusual punishment". Not a peep about Trump's offering up Iraqi oil as pillage. All war crimes, yet. no more "Mr. Constitution" to call them out, for Dear Leader is making America great.<br /><br />Syrian Muslim immigrants are banned. TP says no Muslims are banned. Or is it not ALL Muslims are banned? Or is it Muslims-who-Trump-needs-to-make-examples-of are banned? Or is this too, all Obama's fault? After all Dear Leader blamed Obama for “founding ISIS”. That is some pure sociopath behavior, folks. <br /><br />Anyway you look at it, Muslims are being banned. But there’s “no ban on Muslims”. Orwellian doublethink on display.<br /><br />He projects his "hateful propaganda being disseminated by the Left". Here's what hateful propaganda looks like directed back at him. "Ban the democracy-hating con-servative theocrats! Ban them from our Constitutional Republic! Ban the radical Christian terrorists and every Christian from their country! America shall no longer tolerate Christian hate, intolerance and terror. Oklahoma City and Dr. Tiller did not die in vain, for now we know the true enemies of freedom."<br /><br />I bet that got his attention, but the message is no doubt lost on him. I could say that Muslim refugees understand though .<br /><br />He's too blind to see there are innocent human beings, suffering human beings, who will suffer more, thanks to his Dear Leader's ignorance and hate. He can't see it, perhaps because he shares it. There is no self awareness when it comes to hate born of ignorance. <br /><br />Sadly TP lacks the common sense shown by McCain, and embraces Trumpism. <br /><br />TP is now a foot-soldier for Dear Leader in his war on journalism, war on facts, war on TV News, war on liberals, war on voter rights, and rejection of every other source of information not controlled by Commissar Bannon. <br /><br />He's lost his ability to condemn Trump in any way, and joins the attacks on all of Trump's opposition. There can be no more truth spoken to power, for his side alone controls the truth...that is their Orwellian world now.<br /><br />TP will do his best to help Dear Leader make America great again. Their first target is our free press. Liberals are always fair game. Yes, it is an Orwellian nightmare overtaking our country.<br /><br />For now at last, TP loves Big Brother. <br /><br />If not, he's got me fooled.<br />Dave Dubyahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03279370558997246976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-25595524340115101042017-01-30T22:33:46.347-05:002017-01-30T22:33:46.347-05:00TP - "I guess Trump should tear down the wall...TP - "I guess Trump should tear down the wall and have open borders where all immigrants, legal or otherwise should come into the country just like the Democrats want."<br /><br />TP,<br />Such a comment undermines your credibility. Nobody is suggesting open borders, and you know it. Currently, there are more people going to Mexico than coming from Mexico. No terrorist from the seven banned countries has killed an American since before 9/11. The current system is working. That's not to say it could not be improved, but it is working pretty good. Jerry Critterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01870618647449723147noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-53951511431625678852017-01-30T21:19:43.677-05:002017-01-30T21:19:43.677-05:00"A 'true Muslim ban'? Hell, yes it is..."A 'true Muslim ban'? Hell, yes it is."<br /><br />In the words of the leftist corporate media when criticizing one of their own, that statement of Dave's is not entirely accurate.<br /><br />In the real world, and if journalism wasn't dead, we would call it a lie. It is not a mistake, because Dave knows the truth and yet refuses to correct his statement that it is a "Muslim ban".<br /><br />Muslims are allowed to come to America from Oman, U.A.E., Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Azerbaijan, and many other Muslim nations. How can there be a ban on Muslims when Muslims from those nations are allowed to still come here? What President Trump has done is simply to require a delay so that more intense vetting can be done on people coming from seven countries that the Obama administration had designated as hot spots in order that Trump can better protect Americans.<br /><br />We report... you decide!Darrell Michaelshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05474956372325309461noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-51958583317674789202017-01-30T20:09:59.947-05:002017-01-30T20:09:59.947-05:00TP
It's amazing how a Obama policy when used ...TP<br /><br />It's amazing how a Obama policy when used by Trump is called racist by liberals.<br /><br />Must be because Trump is white, you know blame the white guy.<br /><br />Amazing, putting on hold for a temporary time refugees coming into the USA until a better vetting system can be developed is being called fascism <br /><br />"In the context of terrorism, at least a plurality of Americans are OK with immigration bans.<br /><br />The Trump administration has argued that this is not a ban on Muslims. Rather, they’ll likely argue, as the order itself does, that the policies are meant “to protect the American people from terrorist attacks by foreign nationals admitted to the United States.” It’s not at all clear these policies will actually improve national security, but the American people have been more supportive of immigration restrictions in the name of counterterrorism. In a Quinnipiac University poll conducted in January, 48 percent of voters supported “suspending immigration from ‘terror prone’ regions, even if it means turning away refugees from those regions.” Forty-two percent were opposed. And a December Politico/Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health poll found 50 percent of Americans were in favor of “banning future immigration from regions where there are active terrorist groups.”<br />https://fivethirtyeight.com/Majormajorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05475952962470772705noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-57729470147291854262017-01-30T19:21:24.509-05:002017-01-30T19:21:24.509-05:00Jerry,
You make a very sane point. No wonder the ...Jerry, <br />You make a very sane point. No wonder the Trumpists hate it.<br /><br />TP,<br /><br /><i>Everyone is in turmoil on the left because Trump came into office doing precisely what he said he would do. Amazing.</i><br /><br />Yes. The question is why not YOU? <br /><br />Trump has advocated war crimes like torture and pillaging Iraqi oil. He almost started a trade war with Mexico. He refuses to accept the results of an election HE won! He has to LIE about “millions of illegals” voting for Hillary.<br /><br />And yes, he has banned Muslim refugees. “So far, so good”, my friend? What happened to “Mr. Constitution?” We know. IOKIYAR. <br /><br />A “true Muslim ban”? Hell, yes it is. They ain’t banned ‘cause they’re Klansmen. They are banned Muslims. ISIS loves the propaganda recruitment prize our asshole leader just gave them.<br /><br />Saner Republicans are getting a clue:<br /><br />McCain and Graham wrote in a statement. <br /><br /><i> “Ultimately, we fear this executive order will become a self-inflicted wound in the fight against terrorism. This executive order sends a signal, intended or not, that America does not want Muslims coming into our country. That is why we fear this executive order may do more to help terrorist recruitment than improve our security.”</i><br /><br />We also know that you, and most conservatives, are terrified of letting refugees find asylum here. Germany has admitted 600,000 Syrians, and you’re shocked some criminals made it through. We’ve allowed, what, 15,000 or so? After long periods of vetting at that.<br /><br />Between 1975 and 2015, foreign nationals from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen killed exactly zero Americans on U.S. soil, according to an analysis of terror attacks by the Cato Institute. Now Trump has Americans wetting themselves in fear. (That’s how Nationalist Fascism works, buddy.)<br />You are projecting the phrase "Muslim ban" unto the mythical “Leftist media”. (Evidence offered? Zero.) Have you forgotten the phrase "Muslim ban" <b>originated with Dear Leader</b> when he promised just that?<br /><br />Your “lying MSNBC” is more “Lügenpresse” fascist hyperbole. (Evidence offered? Zero.) Chuck seems tickled by the idea too. You’re both gleefully dancing to Trump’s fiddle there. <br /><br />So you do you hate MSNBC for not repeating YOUR LIE about Obama sending “millions” to “defeat Netanyahu”? There’s that beam again, good sir.<br /><br />Trust me, there’s a LOT more of your indoctrination that is JUST AS FALSE.<br /><br />Starting here:<br /><br />Here we go again with <i>“leftist political bent of the media and deflects it by saying it is "corporatist". </i><br /><br />Not corporatist, you say? Really? Holy crap, you’re gone, pal. <br /><br />That is the Big Lie, the “Lügenpresse”, of fascism. Hell, most major newspapers endorsed Bush over Gore in 2000. Don’t let that fact pop your bubble. Corporate media made Trump.<br /><br />There’s no limit to your willful blindness. You are convinced you have a monopoly on truth when the opposite has been proven again and again.<br /><br />Now you and Chuck go cheer Dear Leader’s great victory.<br /><br />His lies are now your lies, His hate is now your hate. His false beliefs are your false beliefs.<br /><br />You are now a Trumpist. You may as well embrace it, just like you embrace your comrade Chuck’s hate and ignorance. <br />Dave Dubyahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03279370558997246976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-37778410045068808772017-01-30T19:06:57.381-05:002017-01-30T19:06:57.381-05:00No terrorist from any of the seven countries on th...No terrorist from any of the seven countries on the banned list have killed any Americans including on 9/11. The current system seems to be working well. If Trump wanted to improve the system, he could do it without a blanket ban.Jerry Critterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01870618647449723147noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-76939166430644271922017-01-30T18:39:35.841-05:002017-01-30T18:39:35.841-05:00Majormajor, sometimes the painful truth is also hu...Majormajor, sometimes the painful truth is also humorous, huh? :) I don't think our host will find it as amusing though since he still hasn't acknowledged that leftist political bent of the media and deflects it by saying it is "corporatist". IOKIYAD!Darrell Michaelshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05474956372325309461noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-62546904422470047512017-01-30T17:38:55.062-05:002017-01-30T17:38:55.062-05:00"We now return you to your lying MSNBC or Dai... "We now return you to your lying MSNBC or Daily Kos program already in lying progress."<br /><br /><br /><br />LOL ;)Majormajorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05475952962470772705noreply@blogger.com