tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post3473875415940802536..comments2024-03-18T17:42:24.279-04:00Comments on Dave Dubya's Freedom Rants: A Long Road Dave Dubyahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03279370558997246976noreply@blogger.comBlogger148125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-44772938961617021372014-01-25T19:27:28.140-05:002014-01-25T19:27:28.140-05:00Philosophy time:
DD: Money is literally taken fro...Philosophy time:<br /><br />DD: Money is literally taken from me and “trickles up” <br /><br />Free: And money is literally taken from me and "redistributed" to the old. Why is one right and the other wrong?<br /><br />In my case both are true. As far as right v wrong, taking from the least wealthy and healthy, and giving to the rich would be far less morally defensible than having everyone contributing to the needs of the elderly. Many many more of us will get older, and many many fewer will get rich. <br /><br />You didn't distinguish which is right and which is wrong, and why. You seem to be bothered by the rich paying more taxes, but fine with raising taxes on the elderly with limited resources. <br /><br />What about your government benefits when you get old? Right or wrong?<br /><br />Enlighten us. <br /><br />Dave Dubyahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03279370558997246976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-76680594195073909132014-01-25T17:52:22.773-05:002014-01-25T17:52:22.773-05:00Free blathers: Spare me the kookery and conspiracy...Free blathers: <i>Spare me the kookery and conspiracy theories Dave.</i><br /><br />And you neglect again to specify any “kookery and conspiracy theories” from me.<br /><br />You mean this reality?<br /><br /><i> It’s the Israeli Right’s lobby AIPAC, not “the Jews” that has the influence. Have you seen all the AIPAC puppets clamoring to undermine the negotiation process with Iran? Nobody gets into the White House without AIPAC approval. Kissing up to them has practically become mandatory for presidential candidates. </i><br /><br />If you disagree with this, then show us some evidence to refute it. Otherwise shut up.<br /><br />Don’t you know it is essential to both parties to have their presidential candidates speak at AIPAC, unlike nearly all American organizations?<br /><br />Or are you talking about the unanswered questions about 9-11? <br /><br />Here’s an article about that. <br /><br />9-11 Conspiracy Theories Won’t Stop <br /><br />http://www.cbsnews.com/news/9-11-conspiracy-theories-wont-stop/<br /><br /><i>It is impossible to quantify the number of people who subscribe to truther theories, but at least one poll taken five years after the attacks revealed that as many as one out of three Americans believed the U.S. government was either behind the attacks, or knew about them in advance and purposefully did nothing. </i><br /><br />One in three is significant in any world. Note also there was no mention of WTC 7 in that article. None. <br /><br />You are so ideologically blinded and hopelessly authoritarian you think merely asking questions is the same thing as holding a kooky conspiracy theory. <br /><br />BTW, Cindy Sheehan turned on the corpo-dems for being GOP lite war mongers. Democrats, not liberals, “dropped” her.<br /><br />So your ABC link says Michigan “tops the list” for increase in manufacturing jobs. <br /><br />Great. But nothing in the linked documents indicates that claim as true. You made a claim about union jobs. YOU owe us real numbers, sport. SHOW us the numbers or shut up, please. How many times do I have to ask???<br /><br />No wonder people are bored of your senseless drivel. <br /><br />At least you credit Obama with this, then, right?<br /><br /><i>And since January of 2010, the United States has added 520,000 manufacturing jobs, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.</i><br /><br />LOL, Yeah we know, you want it both ways.Dave Dubyahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03279370558997246976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-84122691779291416202014-01-25T17:41:40.411-05:002014-01-25T17:41:40.411-05:00JG
//I suppose it never occurred to you that it c...JG<br /><br />//I suppose it never occurred to you that it could be they're tired of reading your libertarian nonsense//<br /><br /> OR THAT HE IS AS BORING AS ALL GET OUT.okjimmhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11013002335848390765noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-48430742330516393552014-01-25T07:35:03.348-05:002014-01-25T07:35:03.348-05:00Free0352: "This is why as HR pointed out - th...<b>Free0352</b>: "<i>This is why as HR pointed out - the number of commentators has dropped off. Especially liberal ones.</i>"<br /><br />I suppose it never occurred to you that it could be they're tired of reading your libertarian nonsense and your maniacal desire to kill and maim all those who disagree with you.<br /><br />One thing that my fellow liberals and I have in common is an unquenchable desire to right the wrongs of the world. I'm sure if "the liberal ones" were tired of <i>anything</i>, they'd comment and make their viewpoints known.<br /><br />Regarding your reliance on <i>Reductio ad absurdum</i> as a reason for not confronting my opposition to the government fairytale, you still can't take science out of the explanation. Since I have science on my side, and you only have impossibilities sprinkled with a liberal dose of improbabilities and absurdities, I win the argument. <br /><br />The laws of physics don't lie when they're applied to the natural and physical world. If you're willing to debate the specifics of that murderous day, which the government disallowed when they denied the rule of law to be carried through within the court system, then let's do it right here. <br /><br />Otherwise, I win the case, because your "evidence" is circumstantial at best and nonexistent when applied in the proper legal venue. Kangaroo courts don't work for me when coming to a consensus, and conclusion, on the crime of the century.Jefferson's Guardianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16950868026721859555noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-81942609995300855652014-01-24T23:10:34.065-05:002014-01-24T23:10:34.065-05:00BTW Dave,
This is why as HR pointed out - the nu...BTW Dave, <br /><br />This is why as HR pointed out - the number of commentators has dropped off. Especially liberal ones. No self respecting liberal wants to get sucked into your mind boggling audience of conspiracy theory spouting Truthers. Even they know its kookery.<br /><br />Which is why I point it out. They've dropped you for the same reason they dropped Cindy Sheehan and the anti-war movement in general - because they don't want to be associated with kooks and figure the anti-war left with all its wild conspiracy theories and silly ideas gives them a bad name.free0352https://www.blogger.com/profile/09930138880454672809noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-3409682467624775992014-01-24T23:06:05.634-05:002014-01-24T23:06:05.634-05:00Please recite for me where I made any such claim t...<i>Please recite for me where I made any such claim that Afghanistan was fought for oil</i><br /><br />That was more addressed to anti-war memes in general.<br /><br /><i>I guess it's never occurred to you that war, in and of itself, is very lucrative for a very few.</i><br /><br />As if Defense contractors weren't doing infrastructure work with the US military <i>prior</i> to invading Afghanistan? Ah, but <i>any</i> contractor support in your estimation must be war profiteering because ... we shouldn't have an Army to begin with.<br /><br /><i>More false equivalency</i><br /><br />More like <b>EXACT</b> equivalency. You and Donald Trump harbor similar arguments for your pet conspiracy theories. You and Alex Jones aren't even similar - you're identical on the subject.<br /><br /><i>I invited your arguments, on a couple of occasions, about anything regarding the subject</i><br /><br /><i>Reductio ad absurdum (Latin: "reduction to absurdity"), also known as argumentum ad absurdum (Latin: argument to absurdity), is a common form of argument which seeks to demonstrate that a statement is true by showing that a false, untenable, or absurd result follows from its denial</i><br /><br />That is you. I have no desire to argue absurdities with you or Dave about rediculous assertions that <i>THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX™</i> snuck into the WTC and blew it up in a false flag operation to start a war, then shot a cruise missile into the Pentagon for good measure.<br /><br />Its just absurd, and no sensible person dignifies it. Even the uber left admits this is childlike fantasy used to justify the most fantastical arguments that can't hold up to any kind of real scrutiny. Your clown shoes "theory" which is really a paranoid delusion has been so debunked you and your fellow Twoofers have become a rather amusing political punchline.<br /><br />And I don't have serious conversations about jokes.free0352https://www.blogger.com/profile/09930138880454672809noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-17082559911937295672014-01-24T21:32:34.578-05:002014-01-24T21:32:34.578-05:00Free0352: "And Birthers have a great many boo...<b>Free0352</b>: "<i>And Birthers have a great many books THAT PROVE (so they claim) that Obama was born in Kenya.</i>" <br /><br />More false equivalency from the master of deceit and deflection. <br /><br />I invited your arguments, on a couple of occasions, about anything regarding the subject, but you refuse to banter with me. This tells me you know you can't defend the official fairytale, adequately enough, without looking like a fool.<br /><br />Don't let this stop you. I already know you're one.<br /><br />John Myste and Dave Dubya are right.Jefferson's Guardianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16950868026721859555noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-60323507078238966072014-01-24T21:22:21.580-05:002014-01-24T21:22:21.580-05:00Free0352: "As for Afghanistan's oil... th...<b>Free0352</b>: "<i>As for Afghanistan's oil... they don't have any.</i>"<br /><br />and...<br /><br />"<i>But please, tell us more about how we fought this war for oil</i>."<br /><br />Please recite for me where I made any such claim that Afghanistan was fought for oil. While you're at it, please recite where I specifically mentioned Afghanistan at all...<br /><br />Good luck in your search.<br /><br />(I guess it's never occurred to you that war, in and of itself, is very lucrative for a very few. No resources have to even be on the table, but when they are it's a double bonanza!)Jefferson's Guardianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16950868026721859555noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-8290895505414608732014-01-24T01:06:26.492-05:002014-01-24T01:06:26.492-05:00As for Afghanistan's oil... they don't hav...As for Afghanistan's oil... they don't have any.<br /><br />They do have a handful of mineral deposits... that were found <i>nine years</i> after we invaded it. <br /><br />But please, tell us more about how we fought this war for oil.free0352https://www.blogger.com/profile/09930138880454672809noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-34742257528586051442014-01-24T01:03:41.986-05:002014-01-24T01:03:41.986-05:00that today's wars are fought strictly for poli...<i>that today's wars are fought strictly for political and economic gain </i><br /><br />Yes we all know it was a war for oil... except no oil was stolen and no American companies <a href="http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1948787,00.html" rel="nofollow">got any leases.</a><br /><br />Ah but Halliburton made a few bucks... that they could have made more of building oil infrastructure than supporting the US Military through KBR. Your war for oil meme is built on the most fragile of foundations.<br /><br /><i>I've read many. I'm especially partial to those that question -- and prove -- the government's "conspiracy debunking" about what actually happened on 9/11.</i><br /><br />And Birthers have a great many books THAT PROVE (so they claim) that Obama was born in Kenya. <br /><br />If you're reading that tripe - it explains why you're so ignorant on geopolitical topics. <br /><br />But please, by all means explain to us all again how after we've disbanded America's ground forces they will magically learn the institutional memory to fight a modern conflict?<br /><br />Magical thinking after all, is your hallmark. <br /><br /><br />free0352https://www.blogger.com/profile/09930138880454672809noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-2838926022127849362014-01-23T19:28:03.323-05:002014-01-23T19:28:03.323-05:00Free0352: "As for wins on the battlefield, I ...<b>Free0352</b>: "<i>As for wins on the battlefield, I would note our military has won every engagement and met every expectation set for it by its civilian leadership. I would think it obvious our military's Achilles heel is we allow civilians with as a much military skill as you have make its battle field decisions for it.</i>"<br /> <br />...which was, in actuality, your agreement to my remark:<br /> <br />"<i>There's a pattern here, wouldn't you say? The pattern is perpetual and unending war. It's the new cash cow.</i>"<br /> <br />Since you have <i>finally</i> recognized, <i><b>and admitted</b></i>, that today's wars are fought strictly for political and economic gain for the few, why is it that you -- <i>despite understanding this</i> -- continue to embrace your role as a tool in achieving their objectives?<br /><br />There's <i><b>got to be</b></i> a psychosis with a <i>specific name</i> for this. If there isn't, I'm going to recommend that it be named after you! So, tell me, what's your real name again?... <br /> <br /><br />"<i>Go read a book Jeff.</i>"<br /> <br />I've read many. I'm <i>especially</i> partial to those that question -- <i><b>and prove</b></i> -- the government's "conspiracy debunking" about what <i>actually happened</i> on 9/11.Jefferson's Guardianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16950868026721859555noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-350619595768329192014-01-23T14:49:50.068-05:002014-01-23T14:49:50.068-05:00I would also note that every single one of those b...I would also note that every single one of those battles took place before the all volunteer, professional military and the ending of national conscription. free0352https://www.blogger.com/profile/09930138880454672809noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-13401018224604757962014-01-23T14:48:28.346-05:002014-01-23T14:48:28.346-05:00Oki
I was talking about the GWOT genius. And we ...Oki<br /><br />I was talking about the GWOT genius. And we won Khe Sanh.free0352https://www.blogger.com/profile/09930138880454672809noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-75180226280232536462014-01-22T14:39:05.072-05:002014-01-22T14:39:05.072-05:00/As for wins on the battlefield, I would note our .../As for wins on the battlefield, I would note our military has won every engagement and met every expectation set for it by its civilian leadership/<br /><br />Bataan<br />Corregidor<br />Wabash River<br />Little Big Horn<br />Alamo<br />Surrender of Detroit 1812<br />Coral Sea<br />Khe Sanh...<br /><br />and you tell Jeff to read a book??<br /><br /><br />I got a bridge you can buy,too<br />Kassarine Pass<br /><br />okjimmhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11013002335848390765noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-25844846029039101232014-01-21T14:29:03.159-05:002014-01-21T14:29:03.159-05:00Oh, but I do.
Oh really? Where did you learn mil...<i>Oh, but I do.</i><br /><br />Oh really? Where did you learn military tactics Jefferson?<br /><br />As for wins on the battlefield, I would note our military has won every engagement and met every expectation set for it by its civilian leadership. I would think it obvious our military's Achilles heel is we allow civilians with as a much military skill as you have make its battle field decisions for it. <br /><br /><i>Which is what?</i><br /><br />Go read a book Jeff.free0352https://www.blogger.com/profile/09930138880454672809noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-18397811107734294082014-01-20T08:10:34.901-05:002014-01-20T08:10:34.901-05:00Free0352: "You're certainly not going to ...<b>Free0352</b>: "<i>You're certainly not going to win one not knowing how to execute a combined arms operation without visual contact at night now are you?</i>"<br /><br />My point! You <i><b>do</b></i> know, and yet you <i><b>still can't</b></i> beat your opponent whose "complex skills" and technological know-how doesn't even <i>come close</i> to what you're claiming is required.<br /><br />There's a pattern here, wouldn't you say? The pattern is perpetual and unending war. It's the new cash cow.<br /><br /><br />"<i>But then again, you wouldn't really know would you?</i>"<br /><br />Oh, but I do....<br /><br /><br />"<i>Really?</i>"<br /><br />Yes, really...<br /><br /><br />"<i>Then it wouldn't be able to meet its mission requirements.</i>"<br /><br />Which is what?...to invade sovereign countries, occupy its lands, and act as the tool that allows their natural resources to be stolen?<br /><br />That's <i>exactly why</i> Jefferson was adamantly against "standing armies".Jefferson's Guardianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16950868026721859555noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-66591864922350698112014-01-19T21:47:21.717-05:002014-01-19T21:47:21.717-05:00All of those years of "mastering" must e...<i>All of those years of "mastering" must explain why today's army cannot win a war</i><br /><br />You're certainly not going to win one not knowing how to execute a combined arms operation without visual contact at night now are you? This isn't 1775, and a Soldier has to know a few more things than how to fire three aimed shots with a musket per minute in the 21st century. But then again, you wouldn't really know would you?<br /><br /><i> be the catalyst that sets off WWIII.</i><br /><br />As opposed to not having them, which set off world wars I & II.<br /><br /><i> intelligent and rational people recognize it today.</i><br /><br />Really? <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/148163/americans-confident-military-least-congress.aspx" rel="nofollow">The only branch of government a majority of Americans have confidence in?</a> <br /><br /><i>Slash the Corps' ranks to about a quarter of its size -- for starters.</i><br /><br />Really? Then it wouldn't be able to meet its mission requirements. Why not just disband it and avoid paying for a token force? We could go back to drafting people once the enemy was on our shores like in 1775? I mean, that will end well won't it?<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />free0352https://www.blogger.com/profile/09930138880454672809noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-53219405834606817572014-01-19T19:18:27.437-05:002014-01-19T19:18:27.437-05:00Free0352: "Hence Jefferson changed his mind a...<b>Free0352</b>: "<i>Hence Jefferson changed his mind and left a standing force while he was President... but don't let that fact get in your way!</i><br /><br />Truth will always trump your make-believe "facts" every time. We've already been through this, but let me remind you again. As president, Jefferson slashed the size of the army to around 3000 soldiers, closing forts and cutting costs. But he couldn't kill off the army altogether, because the citizen's militia had never been formalized at a federal level. He was a proponent of "no standing armies" all his life, even during his presidency. He never changed his mind, as you erroneously (deceitfully?) have claimed. <br /><br /><br />"<i>Also never mind that the profession of arms has changed a tad in 200 years - requiring a professional Soldier with a diverse number of complex skills that take years to master.</i>"<br /><br />All of those years of "mastering" must explain why today's army cannot win a war.<br /><br /><br />"<i>I'm sure in the even [sic] of WWIII, we can put [an army of soldiers] together pretty quickly...</i>"<br /><br />The irony will be that today's "standing army", and the corporate-states' unending conflicts and imperialistic occupations, will be the catalyst that <i>sets off</i> WWIII.<br /><br />Jefferson recognized the dangers in his day; intelligent and rational people recognize it today.<br /><br /><br />"<i>So after we've disbanded the Army, should we get rid of the Marines too? Just curious.</i>"<br /><br />Slash the Corps' ranks to about a quarter of its size -- for starters.Jefferson's Guardianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16950868026721859555noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-49730746293887616312014-01-19T14:25:34.070-05:002014-01-19T14:25:34.070-05:00Hence...Jefferson's reasoning that standing ar...<i>Hence...Jefferson's reasoning that standing armies can do nothing but become invading forces that support the imperialistic notions of governments.</i> <br /><br />Hence Jefferson changed his mind and left a standing force while he was President... but don't let that fact get in your way!<br /><br />Also never mind that the profession of arms has <i>changed a tad</i> in 200 years - requiring a professional Soldier with a diverse number of complex skills that take years to master. I'm sure in the even of WWIII, we can put that together pretty quickly...<br /><br />As for aggressive forces, the USMC is the most aggressive force able to project power the US has, and its larger than most foreign Armies. There are nearly more Marines in the USMC than there are British Soldiers in the British Army. So after we've disbanded the Army, should we get rid of the Marines too? Just curious. free0352https://www.blogger.com/profile/09930138880454672809noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-40218311835224345412014-01-19T12:13:21.579-05:002014-01-19T12:13:21.579-05:00This comment has been removed by the author.free0352https://www.blogger.com/profile/09930138880454672809noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-55576755805274502112014-01-19T07:38:51.759-05:002014-01-19T07:38:51.759-05:00Free0352: "Ok, Jeff wants to disband the Army...<b>Free0352</b>: "<i>Ok, Jeff wants to disband the Army at the very least. My bad.</i>"<br /><br />You got it! Finally! <br /><br />You forget that my memory's much more acute than yours. Unlike you, I remember what I put into writing. Unlike you, my words come from intellectual reasoning and not from emotion (or intentional deceit).<br /><br /><br />"<i>Especially since the main effort of all FIVE of our military services is supporting the Army.</i>"<br /><br />Hence...Jefferson's reasoning that standing armies can do nothing but become invading forces that support the imperialistic notions of governments. <br /><br />For the most part, the other branches are "defensive" in their roles (or should be). <br /><br /><br />"<i>Well guy, I don't know what else to call you two's kookery. It is what it is.</i>"<br /><br />The "kookery" of Libertarian (i.e., "tea party") philosophy certainly trumps <i>my</i> "kookery" of justice and democracy.<br /><br />Hands down.<br /><br /><br />"<i>And like the vast majority of eathlings [sic]...</i>"<br /><br />What's an "eathling"?<br /><br /><br />"<i>...I'm not going to take it seriously.</i>"<br /><br />You <i>never do</i> take truth, justice or democracy seriously. Tools of the corporate-state never do.Jefferson's Guardianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16950868026721859555noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-1175387266240821872014-01-19T00:32:49.344-05:002014-01-19T00:32:49.344-05:00Goddamn, blogger doesn't want to hyperlink... ...Goddamn, blogger doesn't want to hyperlink... here's try number FOUR.<br /><br />Dave,<br /><br /><i>Money is literally taken from me and “trickles up” </i><br /><br />And money is literally taken from me and "redistributed" to the old. Why is one right and the other wrong?<br /><br /><i>Another of your meaningless claims</i><br /><br /><a href="http://www.nbcnews.com/business/michigan-texas-lead-way-manufacturing-jobs-6C10435413" rel="nofollow">Here you go.</a> At the vast majority of those new blue collar jobs, the employee has the option of joining a union. And many workers do.<br /><br /><br /><i>First of all you don’t even capitalize Jews. Some respect.</i><br /><br />Whether I respect <b>JEWS</b> (happy?) or not is irrelevant to the fact that they do not control our government. <br /><br />And you and Jeff think they do, just like Hitler and Henry Ford did.<br /><br /><i>Kissing up to them has practically become mandatory for presidential candidates.</i> <br /><br />Yeah, they use all the influence they have with international banking to bribe or put pressure on gentile politicians, right? <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion" rel="nofollow">I think I read that somewhere before.</a><br /><br /><br />Spare me the kookery and conspiracy theories Dave. Especially your more creepy ones.<br /><br />Jeff,<br /><br /><i>You erroneously claimed that I said to disband the "military".</i><br /><br />Ok, Jeff wants to disband the Army at the very least. My bad.<br /><br /><b>This is just as batshit insane BTW</b>. Especially since the main effort of all FIVE of our military services is supporting the Army.<br /><br /><i>you resort to name-calling</i> <br /><br />Well guy, I don't know what else to call you two's kookery. It is what it is. And like the vast majority of eathlings, I'm not going to take it seriously.free0352https://www.blogger.com/profile/09930138880454672809noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-61679176445132251422014-01-19T00:23:37.579-05:002014-01-19T00:23:37.579-05:00This comment has been removed by the author.free0352https://www.blogger.com/profile/09930138880454672809noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-67694250466656154312014-01-19T00:16:30.272-05:002014-01-19T00:16:30.272-05:00This comment has been removed by the author.free0352https://www.blogger.com/profile/09930138880454672809noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-134372208798387606.post-30572955651672744922014-01-19T00:08:56.748-05:002014-01-19T00:08:56.748-05:00This comment has been removed by the author.free0352https://www.blogger.com/profile/09930138880454672809noreply@blogger.com